Monday, 30 September 2013

Anger as Ghana hikes prices of water and power

By FRANCIS KOKUTSE in Accra | Friday, September 27  2013 at  17:33
Cost of electricity and water is expected to rise sharply in Ghana if new rates are adopted. FILE | NATION MEDIA GROUP 
For some Ghanaians, the Public Utility Regulatory Commission (PURC) has failed to keep its promise after it finally raised utility prices with a 78.9 per cent slap on electricity and 52 per cent on water on Wednesday.
Earlier, the Commission dismissed speculations of imminent increases.
Though the increases were lower than the 166 per cent and 122 per cent requested by the electricity and water providers respectively, they were received with anger.
The Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG) wanted the increase in order to help it bridge its $170 million annual funding gap. Power generators, Volta River Authority (VRA) wanted an increase of 137.5 per cent; power carriers, Ghana Grid Company Limited, 39.36 per cent; and the Ghana Water Company, 99.39 per cent.
The country's Trades Union Congress (TUC) has reacted angrily.
“It is huge and we cannot pay,” said, the Secretary-General, Mr Kofi Asamoah.
Mr Asamoah said, the labour movement was not totally opposed to tariff adjustment. “It is, however, unfair to the people of Ghana and we are angry because the figures are unacceptable as the pay increment that the government granted to workers is just 10 per cent,” he added.
Mr Asamoah said, “it is sad that PURC is engaging in political expediency which might lead to the closure of some industries or even relocation of others”.
PURC spokesperson Nana Yaa Jantuah, denied the charge.
Already, there were signs that the commission was going to face the wrath of the public. An Accra owner of a water packaging firm, Mr Andrews Sekyi said, “the PURC has just swindled the people and is taking them for a ride”.
Proposal gaps
By March this year, Ms Jantuah publicly condemned a World Bank report which accused PURC of incompetence for failing to adjust existing low utility prices.
In response, PURC asked the Bank to apologise and described as “woefully unacceptable” the attack on the competence of its management and board.
The World Bank’s attack followed a study which noted that, “costly energy subsidies, and higher interest cost, pushed the fiscal deficit to about 12 per cent of GDP,” adding that, “activity in the non-oil sector is dampened by energy disruptions”.
In addition, it was the Bank’s view that, the board members of PURC and ECG lacked managerial competence, which had resulted in the mediocre performance of the energy sector.
Mr Sekyi said, PURC needed to explain to the people why it lied that there would not be any increase.
On April 17, Ms Jantuah told a press conference that, “upward review is not possible now, particularly given the fact that the right processes have to be followed”.
That was when the utility providers sought approval to increase tariff rates.
“We are looking at the proposals now. There are even some proposal gaps that must to be filled and before that is done, we cannot say that the proposal is complete,” she said.
Ms Jantuah also said that utility providers were expected to publish their proposals in the newspapers for the public to respond before effecting changes.
Some pressure groups have threatened protests if the government does not back down on the price increases.
The Alliance for Accountable Governance (AFAG) accused PURC of pandering to the wishes of the World Bank.
Extra crude oil
“We will do everything possible to make the government reverse this price increase that is likely to affect the ordinary people more,” AFAG said in a statement.
But even as temperatures rose, it did not look like the government was ready to reverse the decision because the sector has been bedevilled by a myriad of problems that must be tackled.
The World Bank has accused the government of delaying investments in gas supply and power generation, which, it said was the cause of power shortages for most part of this year.
“While the blackouts are partly due to the unexpected interruption of imported gas supplies, a deeper look reveals a broader problem of a power sector without a cushion to absorb external shocks.”
It also cited delays in the production of gas from the Jubilee Fields, which has left power plants idle or burning very expensive oil.
So far, a three-year delay in commercialising Jubilee gas has cost Ghana a billion dollars in extra crude oil used for power generation. Also, Ghana has not been able to attract substantial private investment in power generation because of the low creditworthiness of its utilities.
“Several state-owned energy enterprises and oversight entities are underperforming. There is an absence of accountability and proper oversight and a lack of sanctions for non-performance in delivery of energy supply. Third, the current pricing/tariff and subsidy policies for energy are not financially sustainable,” the Bank's report said.
It also said, energy providers did not collect adequate revenues from users and struggled with inadequate state subsidies, consequently, the providers found it difficult to maintain and expand their physical infrastructure while at the same time, the burden of these subsidies weighed heavily on the nation’s budget.
Against this background, the government was unlikely to side with the poor to reverse the price increases, hoping that with time, the anger would cease.

SOURCE: AFRICAN REVIEW