Monday, 21 October 2013

Minister Kagasheki has done his bit, compared to the rest of Govt


20th October 2013

Natural Resources and Tourism Minister Ambassador Khamis Kagasheki has found himself in slippery ground, tasked with defending the country’s wildlife and other natural resources but without the means to do it.

It has become increasingly obvious that the decimation of big game and especially rhino and elephants was being properly coordinated within the game reserves and national parks.
It is not a question of rangers failing to control poachers, despite that a section of the latter go around, with international wire reports saying that wildlife trophies have replaced piracy on seagoing vessels in the manner in which Al Shabaab collect funds for their wars.

There are also unquestionably reliable reports that within the Congo and into the forests of South Sudan, Chad, and up to the Central African Republic, the now melting away fighters of the Lord’s Resistance Army build sporadic camps, harvest trophies, and when US drones start being seen overhead, move on.

Clearing spaces is becoming risky with advanced surveillance and espionage techniques, in which case the scale of ravages by Africa’s warlords shall start diminishing, but they will not go without a fight.
That is also what is being experienced here, that the pressures for harvesting wildlife are rising, for unmet incomes and organizational needs, coordinated from above.

That is the only conclusion we can reach in the face of repeated reports from environmental activists visiting villagers in various areas especially around the Loliondo and Ngorongoro precincts, who say that uniformed warders are seen shooting at elephants or rhino.

While impersonation could work for criminals robbing a bank in police uniform, why should tusk harvesters need game warden’s uniform? In that case the minister’s time bomb that regional crime officials in Arusha know more than they are saying about the carnage in the northern safari zone starts making sense. Ambassador Kagasheki decided to do a Pilate, washing his hands off the issue that way.
The question is who else can take it up, and the answer is definitely no, and for one reason, that this method of harvesting animals is a result of the long standing dispute between countries in most sub-Saharan Africa and environmental activists in Europe and North America, as to programmed culling and sales of the resources.

There was a time a conflict was brewing up between the government and donor agencies on costs of maintaining a huge stockpile of trophies worth Tsh11bn or so, and repeated CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) kept returning the same answer. Conserve! Conserve! Conserve! Elephants will only die a natural death.

This sort of breakdown of governance is also being experienced in other areas, as criminality in one area affects the mood in government generally, as all branches of government finally depend on the police and courts to ensure that order is kept, and governance imperatives of breaking local and international law must sideline the police.

Having sidelined the police in the area of wildlife, it is not difficult to see they are sidelined in the sphere of drugs, or vice versa, and the higher the pressures are noticed for illegality, the more such activities are conducted with impunity. So despite the minister’s brave face on the matter, the question is: can it start with the RCO, really?

Looking at the matter a bit closely, we find the answer written all over the faces of top government officials, as the president once said he had the names of drug barons, and no one heard more on the issue.
In South Africa lately a fairly recognizable artiste from Tanzania turned up with what was believed to be heroine, but miracles do happen – it now appears there was a mistake somewhere, and a rare powder was not being invoked.

What can be surmised out of this is that the political and economic system is passing through a crude phase, where its money needs are greater than loyalty to the ethics it is expected to serve, thus the carnage and complaints as to who is responsible. Social science knows what happens when lawlessness reigns: a revolution, but peaceful or violent? 

SOURCE: GUARDIAN ON SUNDAY