It is a conflict that presents a dangerous set of
challenges for those trying to document and make sense of Syria's civil
war - journalists, filmmakers, activists and ordinary citizens.
But it turned into a full-blown conflict between the government of President Bashar al-Assad and the opposition forces trying to force him out of power. Much of the world's view of the war has been shaped by the tens of thousands of online videos posted on Youtube, Twitter and other social media. Many of these have provided a valuable window on Syria's war, but many videos are also shot in areas out of the reach of independent journalists, and with that comes the challenge of separating fact from fiction. Syria has become an extremely dangerous place for journalists, photographers and video camera operators. At least 50 reporters were killed in Syria since the start of the war, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. In 2011, Syria was ranked the eighth most dangerous country in the world for journalists - two reporters were killed that year. In 2012, conditions deteriorated and Syria became by far the most dangerous country to report from, with 31 journalists killed in combat, or targeted by either government or opposition forces. This year, Syria remains the worst country to report from, with 17 journalists killed so far. So, has the Syrian conflict become too dangerous to cover? Inside Syria, with presenter Hazem Sika, discusses with guests: Matthew Van Dyke, the filmmaker of a documentary about Syria called Not Anymore: A Story of Revolution; Joshua Landis, the director of the Center for Middle East Studies and a professor at the University of Oklahoma; and Zeina Khodr, Al Jazeera's senior correspondent who has been covering the Syrian conflict from the beginning. SOURCE: AL JAZEERA |
Monday, 4 November 2013
Syria: Too dangerous to cover?
